In an interesting decision handed down by the Illinois Appellate Court in the summer of 2015, police are once again held to a high standard when executing anticipatory search warrants. In executing these warrants, and specifically when police have installed a “breakaway filament” to alert them to the opening of a package, the Appellate Court held in People v. Harris, that when using such a device the police must in fact confirm that the filament is broken and the package has actually been opened before executing the search warrant and arresting the party in possession of the package. The breaking of the filament was determined to be the triggering event that authorizes police execution of a search warrant in these types of cases. A violation of this procedure would result in the exclusion of subsequent evidence and statements gathered as a result of the execution of the warrant. See 2015 IL App (1st) 132162 for a detailed review of the case.
If you find yourself a defendant in a search warrant case involving cannabis, cocaine, ecstacy, or other drugs in Chicago, Cook County, Will County, DuPage County, or surrounding counties, call the drug attorneys at the D&O Law Group, LLC for a review of your case and protection of your constitutional rights.
At D&O Law Group, we love to help good people in tough situations. Thanks to the efforts of Boris Djulabic & Camilo Oceguera, a young man facing 6-30 years in prison on a Class X Narcotics felony received a miracle in the form of a few years of probation that may be wiped from his […]
This morning a young college aged woman stood before the Court facing up to 180 days in jail and a misdemeanor conviction for aggravated speeding 26+ mph. The attorney’s at D&O stood by her side, and advocated to the State that our client was a hard working college student who regretted her mistake. After some […]
Today, Boris Djulabic and Camilo Oceguera of www.dandolegal.comhelped a young man get his professional life back. Working for a major corporation that required certain professional licenses, he was told he could not meet the criteria for said license due to a conviction in the early 2000’s for a gun offense. It was his first and last run-in with the law. […]